43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 155, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8022, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,764 United States of America v. Clayton Ross Bracy, United States of America v. David Wayne Hogle, United States of America v. Perry Gilmartin, United States of America v. Richard Melvin Garfinkle

Good Law
67 F.3d 1421
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 199594-10033California7,699 words

Opinion

Opinion

67 F.3d 1421 43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 155 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8022, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13 ,764 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clayton Ross BRACY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Wayne HOGLE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Perry GILMARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Melvin GARFINKLE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10726, 93-10727, 93-10782 and 94-10033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 7, 1995. Decided Oct. 12, 1995. Edward B. Horn, Reno, Nevada, for defendant-appellant Clayton Ross Bracy; Mary E. Boetsch, Sinai, Schroeder, Mooney & Boetsch, Reno, Nevada, for defendant-appellant David Wayne Hogle; Kenneth R. Howard, Reno, Nevada, for defendant-appellant Perry Joseph Gilmartin; Loren Graham, Zephyr Cove, Nevada, for defendant-appellant Richard Garfinkle. Daniel G. Bogden, William M. Welch II, and L. Anthony White, Assistant United States Attorneys, Reno, Nevada, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Before: BRUNETTI,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.