UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Edward STEARNS, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
68 F.3d 328·95 Daily Journal DAR 13782·1995 WL 608543·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 28210·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8030
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 12, 199594-35451California1,317 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fernandez, J.

Richard Edward Stearns pled guilty to two counts of bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). He was sentenced and did not appeal, but about two years later he filed a petition which alleged that his attorney had failed to file a notice of appeal, as requested. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . The district court denied the petition, and Stearns appeals. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

Stearns was charged with the robbery of a bank in Medford, Oregon. He pled guilty to that charge, but before his sentencing he was charged with the further crime of robbing a bank in Bonita, California. That case was transferred to the federal district court in Oregon, and he pled guilty to that charge also.

On February 5, 1992, the district court sentenced him on both charges, and no appeal followed. However, on February 1, 1994, Stearns filed a petition under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in which he alleged, among other things, that his attorney was ineffective because she “failed to advise him of his right to appeal his sentence, and failed to file a timely notice of appeal.” He added that he “had expressed his desire so to do to counsel.” In a letter to Stearns, counsel had indicated that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.