Kashuba

Kashuba v. Legion Insurance

Good Law
139 F.3d 1273·1998 WL 133845
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 1998Nos. 96-70850, 96-70915California1,467 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tashima, J.

Aleksandr Kashuba filed a claim for compensation and notice of injury pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (“LHWCA”). 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 . The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) granted an award of temporary total disability compensation, but found that Ka-shuba was not entitled to a permanent partial disability award or medical benefits. In No. 96-70850, Kashuba petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board’s (“BRB” or “Board”) order affirming the ALJ’s decision. 1 In No. 96-70915, Northwest Marine, Inc. and Legion Insurance Company (collectively “Employer”) seek review of the finding that Employer was not prejudiced by Kashuba’s failure to give timely notice of his injury. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 921 (c), and we grant Employer’s petition. Because we find that Employer was prejudiced by the lack of timely notice, Kashuba is not entitled to benefits, and his petition is therefore denied.

*1275 I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

The ALJ’s findings must be accepted unless contrary to law, irrational, or unsupported by substantial evidence. See Port of Portland v. Director, OWCP, 932 F.2d 836 , 838 (9th Cir.1991).

Jones Stevedoring Co. v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.