Veneman

Shamrock Farms Co. v. Veneman

Good Law
146 F.3d 1177·98 Daily Journal DAR 7395·1998 WL 351231·1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 14859·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5256
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 1998No. 97-15428California3,634 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Shamrock Farms operates a dairy farm in Arizona and sells the raw milk it produces to Shamrock Foods, a milk processor also located in Arizona. Shamrock Foods distributes packaged fluid milk products to a number of western states, including California. Together, Shamrock Farms' and Shamrock Foods (collectively “Shamrock”) filed suit against the state of California in federal district court alleging that various California laws and regulations governing the sale of milk products in that state violate the Commerce Clause. Shamrock asserts that the California provisions effectively prohibit out-of-state milk producers from selling their products in that state and impose an undue burden on interstate commerce. The district court dismissed Shamrock’s claims pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), holding that a federal statute clearly authorizes California’s laws and regulations and insulates them from Commerce Clause challenges.

BACKGROUND

At issue in this case are various California regulations that govern the composition of consumer milk, in particular, those governing the content of both milkfat and solids-not-fat (“SNF”), as well as various California laws that govern milk pricing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.