Ana Antonia Orosco-Obando, A/K/A Ana Orosco Wall v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
68 F.3d 480·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 199595-70195California889 words

Opinion

Opinion

68 F.3d 480 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ana Antonia OROSCO-OBANDO, a/k/a Ana Orosco Wall, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70195. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1995. * Decided Oct. 20, 1995. 1 Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Ana Antonia Orosco-Obando, ("Petitioner"), a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of her appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying her applications for asylum and withholding of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1158 (a) and 1253(h). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 4 Because the BIA conducted a de novo review of the record and clearly incorporated the IJ's decision, we treat the IJ's statement of reasons as the BIA's and review the IJ's decision. See Alaelua v. INS,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.