Burns

Burns v. Stone Forest Industries, Inc.

Good Law
147 F.3d 1182·1998 WL 388497
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 1998No. 96-35715California1,882 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kleinfeld, J.

The only significant issue in this case is whether employees deprived of 60 days notice of a plant closing are entitled to get paid for each of the 60 days, or for what would have been work days during the 60 days. The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq., controls. We join most of the other circuits *1183 that have ruled on the issue in construing the statute.to mean work days.

FACTS

Because of restrictions on timber supply and rising costs, Stone Forest Industries shut down its plywood mill in Albany, Oregon. The company told the employees on September 26,1994, that the mill would close two days- later, September 28, but that they would be paid until November 26, 61 days after the notice. They could pick up their paychecks each payday at the personnel office. Even though the mill would be closed and they would not be working, they would get paid during the 61 days, measured by what they had worked before the shutdown, with benefits and vacation pay to be cashed out with their final paychecks.

The full time employees brought a class action for additional pay. Their theory was that they should get paid for each calendar day during the last…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.