Dean Edward Bowen v. Mark A. Henry, Warden

68 F.3d 480 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dean Edward BOWEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark A. HENRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-55032. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1995. * Decided Oct. 20, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Dean Edward Bowen appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 habeas corpus petition challenging the sentence imposed following his violation of the special parole term imposed pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 in connection with the revocation of the parole term he was serving for a narcotics conviction in the Western District of Washington. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Grady v. Crabtree, 958 F.2d 874, 874 (9th Cir. 1992) (per curiam), and affirm. 3 Bowen contends that the United States Parole Commission ("Commission") acted beyond its authority by…