Campbell v. NYE County School Dist.

Good Law
68 F.3d 480·1995 WL 597706·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34506
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 10, 199594-15747California1,259 words

Opinion

Opinion

68 F.3d 480 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John CAMPBELL; Noel Furman; Arrin Campbell; Nathan Morin; Collette Furman; Mary Campbell; Susan Morin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NYE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; Selway L. Mulkey; Lanny C. Weyen; Robert W. Ragar, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15747. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 11, 1995. Decided Oct. 10, 1995. Before: HALL, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellants appeal the dismissal of their class action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1401 , et seq. (1995), and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1995). The district court dismissed both claims for failure to exhaust state administrative remedies as required by 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1415 (e)(2) and 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1415 (f). Although Appellants' IDEA and Sec. 1983 claims based on the District's disciplinary suspensions and failure to provide educational evaluations are properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.