People of the State of California v. H & H Ship Service Company, a California Corporation, Dba H & H Environmental Services
Opinion
Opinion
68 F.3d 481 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H & H SHIP SERVICE COMPANY, a California Corporation, dba H & H Environmental Services, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10182. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 1995. Submission Vacated March 8, 1995. Resubmitted Sept. 22, 1995. Decided Oct. 17, 1995. Before: REINHARDT, THOMPSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 H & H Ship Service Company ("H & H") challenges its conviction under section 5650(f) of the California Fish and Game Code, which prohibits the release of substances deleterious to fish, plants, or birds into state waters. H & H also challenges the district court's order that it pay restitution to the State of California ("the State") and the County of Alameda ("the County"). We affirm H & H's conviction. However, we reverse the restitution awards and remand for further…