Elias Shokrian v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

Good Law
68 F.3d 481·1995 WL 623426·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34521
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 20, 199594-55809California787 words

Opinion

Opinion

68 F.3d 481 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elias SHOKRIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55809. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1995. * Decided Oct. 20, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Elias Shokrian appeals the district court's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his action against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") alleging breach of contract and fraud. Shokrian's action arose out of a proposed restructuring of obligations under a note and deed of trust held by Freddie Mac on property owned by Shokrian. Shorkrian sought to bind Freddie Mac to an alleged oral contract whose terms were set out in a November 19, 1992 letter sent by Howard Jackson, a Senior Asset Resolution Specialist at Freddie Mac, to Shokrian. 3 We review de novo the district court's Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal. See Roth v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.