Aleko Perfanov v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
68 F.3d 481·1995 WL 608445·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 34530
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 199594-70161California599 words

Opinion

Opinion

68 F.3d 481 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Aleko PERFANOV, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70161. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 21, 1995. Decided Oct. 16, 1995. 1 Before: NOONAN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges; LEW, District Judge * . 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Aleko Perfanov (Perfanov) petitions this court to review the order of the Board of Immigration Appeal (Board) denying asylum and withholding of deportation. We deny the petition. PROCEEDINGS 4 On August 5, 1991, the INS served Aleko Perfanov (Perfanov) with an order to show cause why he should not be deported for entering the United States without inspection by an immigration officer. On October 21, 1991, Perfanov, appearing pro se, conceded deportability and expressed fear at the thought of returning to Bulgaria. The Immigration Judge (IJ) found Perfanov deportable, and continued the hearing so that Perfanov could seek counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.