Petrescu v. I.N.S.
Opinion
Opinion
68 F.3d 481 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elena PETRESCU, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Clifton J. Rogers, Acting District Director, INS; Rolland J. Johnson, Assistant District Director, INS; Doris M. Meissner, INS Commissioner; Linda Gonzalez, Inspector; and Does I through X, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-56726. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 8, 1995. * Decided Oct. 6, 1995. Before: THOMPSON, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Elena Petrescu was adjudged excludable by an Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) immigration law judge, and appealed that ruling to the Board of Immigration Appeals. In the meantime, she sought a writ of habeas corpus from the district court because the INS denied her parole. The district court denied the writ and denied Petrescu's request to set a bond for her release. Thereafter, the INS fixed bond in the amount of $25,000, and later…