Scott v. Minuteman Press Intern., Inc.

68 F.3d 481 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Winfield W. SCOTT; Patricia D. Scott; Clinton Graham; Ronald J. Svoboda; Thelma Svoboda; David A. Faria; Brenda F. Faria, individually and dba Minuteman Press, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MINUTEMAN PRESS INTERNATIONAL, INC.; Roy W. Titus; Jeffrey A. Haber, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15140. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 11, 1995. Decided Oct. 13, 1995. 1 Before: BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and QUACKENBUSH, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from a Judgment entered following a jury verdict in favor of Defendants-Appellees, Minuteman Press International, Inc. (hereafter "Minuteman") and three of its officers and employees. 4 Plaintiffs' numerous claims, including breach of contract and RICO violations, as well as fraud, were based primarily on alleged fraud and misrepresentations by the Defendants in connection with franchise…