U.S. for Use and Benefit of U.S.G., Inc. v. Pharaoh Const., Inc.

68 F.3d 482 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of U.S.G., INC. dba University Service Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PHARAOH CONSTRUCTION, INC.; Armando S. Dablado, an individual; George W. Parker, an individual, Defendants, and Mary P. Hogan and Michael A. Hogan, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-55676. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 12, 1995. * Decided Oct. 6, 1995. 1 Before: BROWNING, PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** FACTS 3 The facts of this case are known to both parties. ANALYSIS 4 Standard of Review. 5 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994). We must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant…