United States v. Diego Angel Olvera, AKA "Taco,"

68 F.3d 482 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diego Angel OLVERA, aka "Taco," Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30143. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1995. * Decided Oct. 20, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Diego Angel Olvera appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 . He contends the district court erred when it: (a) calculated his sentence based on D-methamphetamine rather than L-methamphetamine; and (b) failed to elicit fully articulated objections following the imposition of sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's factual findings at sentencing for clear error. United States v. Dudden, Nos. 93-30389, 93-30390, slip op. 11507, 11525 (9th Cir. Sept. 13, 1995). The district court's…