Kiernan

Kiernan v. Zurich Companies

Good Law
150 F.3d 1120·1998 WL 420313
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 28, 1998No. 96-56854California1,632 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pregerson, J.

Plaintiff Christopher Kiernan suffered bodily injuries while parasailing from a boat owned by Capistrano Parasail, Inc. 1 Kiernan sued Capistrano for damages. In 1994, a jury returned a verdict in Kiernan’s favor for $100,000. His costs of suit were $11,038.72. Capistrano failed to pay the judgment. Kier-nan then filed an action in state court against Capistrano’s insurer, Zurich Companies, to recover on the judgment. Kiernan brought his action against Zurich under California Insurance Code § 11580(b)(2), which permits a judgment creditor to bring a direct action against an insurer to collect a judgment awarded against an insured. The action was removed to federal court on grounds of diversity.

The parties agreed to a stipulated trial on the issue whether Kiernan could bring a direct action against Zurich . under § 11580(b)(2). The district court found that Kiernan could bring such an action and entered judgment for Kiernan in the amount of $136,412.77, which included additional costs and interest. Zurich appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I. KIERNAN’S RIGHT TO DIRECTLY SUE ZURICH

Disputes arising under marine insurance contracts are governed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.