Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Natural Beverage Distributors, D/B/A Mendocino Coast Distributing Co. Florence M. Beardslee

Good Law
69 F.3d 337·95 Daily Journal DAR 14487·1995 WL 628473·33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 266·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 30827
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 199593-17335California9,079 words

Opinion

Opinion

Choy, J.

Ms. Florence Beardslee and Natural Beverage Distributors (collectively “Beardslee”) appeal the district court’s Orders granting partial summary judgment to plaintiff An-heuser-Busch, Inc. (“Anheuser”), ordering a new trial on her counterclaim against Anheu-ser, and ultimately dismissing her counterclaim. We affirm all three rulings.

I.

For many years, Beardslee solely-owned and operated Natural Beverage, a wholesale distributorship for Anheuser. Relations between Anheuser and all of its wholesale distributors are governed by a written agreement called the “Anheuser-Busch, Inc. Wholesaler Equity Agreement” (the “Agreement”). Beardslee entered into the Agreement with Anheuser in late 1984. This appeal emanates from litigation surrounding Anheuser’s termination of Beardslee’s distributorship in 1989.

The Successor-Manager Nomination

Under the Agreement, Beardslee is required to designate a “Successor-Manager,” subject to Anheuser’s approval, who is capable of taking over the business in the event that the manager no longer can perform his or her duties. Anheuser may not unreasonably withhold its approval of the proposed individual. In the event that Anheuser does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.