Widnall

Gregory v. Widnall

Good Law
153 F.3d 1071·98 Daily Journal DAR 9580·1998 WL 556524·74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,562·77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1750
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 1998No. 97-35600California2,011 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Eric Gregory, an African-American civilian technician in the Alaska Air National Guard, was awarded $150,000 after prevailing in an EEOC action and subsequent Title VII suit against his employer (“Gregory I”). Judgment was based on a series of discriminatory acts by Colonel Van Williams, the second in command, which culminated in Gregory’s termination in 1992. Sergeant Gregory was reinstated to his old position in September 1994, but relations remained tense with some of his supervisors. After a short time back on the job, Gregory brought a series of new EEOC actions, alleging a variety of discriminatory practices by his superiors based on his race, sex, and prior protected actions.

In his second formal EEOC complaint, filed November 1994, Gregory claimed to have been falsely accused by a management-level employee, Senior Master Sergeant Mary Hamby, of losing the promotion package of a senior officer, Major Burton. Ham-by was the subject of an outstanding military social actions complaint brought by Gregory. When the Burton promotion package could not be located, she continued to maintain that she left the package on Gregory’s desk. Gregory informed her that he kept logs of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.