95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8505, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,675 United States of America v. Guillermo Jaramillo

Good Law
69 F.3d 388
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 199594-10563California2,263 words

Opinion

Opinion

69 F.3d 388 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8505 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,675 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo JARAMILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10563. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 16, 1995. * Decided Nov. 2, 1995. 1 Larry Kupers, Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellant. 2 Jeffrey L. Borstein, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for plaintiff-appellee. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 4 Before: PREGERSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and McLAUGHLIN, ** District Judge. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge: 5 Guillermo Jaramillo appeals his conviction for making false declarations under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We reverse. 6 * Standard of Review 7 The district court's statutory interpretation is reviewed de novo. United States v. Polizzi, 801 F.2d 1543, 1547 (9th Cir.1986). A district court's factual findings are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Schmidt, 573 F.2d 1057, 1066 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 881 , 99 S.Ct. 221 , 58 L.Ed.2d 194…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.