95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8594, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,830 Feminist Women's Health Center, and Beverly Whipple Diane Hale Kimberly Boy Deborah Barton v. Sharon Codispoti, and Dottie Roberts Curtis Beseda Carl Codispoti, Feminist Women's Health Center Beverly Whipple Diane Hale Kimberly Boy Deborah Barton v. Sharon Codispoti Curtis Beseda Carl Codispoti, and Dottie Roberts, Feminist Women's Health Center Beverly Whipple Diane Hale Kimberly Boy Deborah Barton v. Dottie Roberts Curtis Beseda Carl Codispoti, and Sharon Codispoti, and Ronald T. Schaps Ronald E. McKinstry Brian Zeringer, Attorneys for Sharon Codispoti

Good Law
69 F.3d 399
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 199591-35006California632 words

Opinion

Opinion

69 F.3d 399 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8594 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,830 FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Beverly Whipple; Diane Hale; Kimberly Boy; Deborah Barton, Plaintiffs, v. Sharon CODISPOTI, Defendant-Appellant, and Dottie Roberts; Curtis Beseda; Carl Codispoti, et al., Defendants. FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER; Beverly Whipple; Diane Hale; Kimberly Boy; Deborah Barton, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Sharon CODISPOTI; Curtis Beseda; Carl Codispoti, Defendants, and Dottie Roberts, Defendant-Appellant. FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER; Beverly Whipple; Diane Hale; Kimberly Boy; Deborah Barton, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Dottie ROBERTS; Curtis Beseda; Carl Codispoti, et al., Defendants, and Sharon Codispoti, Defendant-Appellant, and Ronald T. Schaps; Ronald E. McKinstry; Brian Zeringer, attorneys for defendant Sharon Codispoti, Appellants. Nos. 90-35266, 90-35298 and 91-35006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Nov. 7, 1995. NOONAN, Circuit Judge. 1 The Constitution of the United States, Article VI, provides: "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States." The plaintiffs in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.