Chong Kook Kim v. Yong Do Kang

Good Law
154 F.3d 996·98 Daily Journal DAR 9430·1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21181·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6767
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 1998Nos. 97-55334, 97-55588 and 97-55621California2,407 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nelson, J.

Appellants Chong Kook Kim and Kum Ju Kim (“the Kims”) challenge a final judgment issued by the district court that distributes funds placed in escrow by the Appellees Kenny Kang, Lisa Kang, Yong Do Kang and Jin 0. Kang (“the Kangs”) in preparation for their purchase of a liquor market from the Kims. Southbay Business Brokers (“the Broker”), which represented the Kangs in their efforts to purchase the market, also appeals the district court’s judgment. It challenges the court’s decision not to award it attorney’s fees incurred in defending against cross-claims filed by the Kangs. The issues raised on this appeal are discrete: (1) whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over the action; (2) whether the court erred in revising earlier rulings regarding the distribution of the escrow funds; and (3) whether the court erred in declining to award attorney’s fees to the Broker. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Kims owned a liquor store in San Pedro, California, called Harbor Market. Through the Broker, the Kangs offered to purchase the store; and, after some negotiation, the Kims accepted the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.