Lunsford

Lunsford v. Jumao-As

Good Law
155 F.3d 1178·1998 WL 683306·1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 24606·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7595
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 5, 1998No. 96-56503California234 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER WITHDRAWING ORDER AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

The published Order filed February 13, 1998 [ 139 F.3d 1233 ], is withdrawn and a substitute order is filed simultaneously with this order.

Appellees’ Petition for Rehearing is DENIED except as reflected in the substitute order.

*1179 ORDER

John Wayne Lunsford, a federal prisoner, seeks only damages in his Bivens action for claims arising from past conduct by prison officials because he received the corrective surgery he required before this action was filed. He does not request that the Bureau of Prisons be required to take further corrective action. We agree with both parties that Lunsford was therefore not required to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing this lawsuit in the district court in light of the fact that the Administrative Remedy Program only provides for injunctive relief. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 327 , 108 S.Ct. 592 , 98 L.Ed.2d 686 (1988); 28 C.F.R. § 542.12 (b). Therefore, we VACATE the district court’s order dismissing Lunsford’s complaint and denying his application to proceed in fo?ma pauperis, and REMAND this case to the district court for further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.