Davis v. Walbrook Ins. Co.

Good Law
69 F.3d 543·1995 WL 641349·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37646
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 199594-15703California829 words

Opinion

Opinion

69 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph D. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WALBROOK INS. CO.; Dart Kraft Insurance Company; El Paso Insurance Company; Louisville Insurance Company; Ludgate Insurance Company Limited; Mutual Reinsurance Company, Limited; Compagnie Europeenne D'Assurances Industrielles S.A.; Assicurazioni Generali Spa, London Branch; H.S. Weavers (Underwriting) Agencies, Ltd.; Los Angeles Bar Association; Emmett & Chandler Los Angeles, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15703. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 17, 1995. Decided Oct. 31, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ralph D. Davis appeals the grant of summary judgment to defendants Ludgate Insurance Company, Compagnie Europeenne D'Assurances Industrielles, and Dearborn Insurance Company (collectively "Ludgate"). 1 Summary judgment was granted both on Davis's direct action claim against Ludgate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.