Blue-Sky v. Gomez

Good Law
69 F.3d 543·1995 WL 643192·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37622
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 199594-15556California296 words

Opinion

Opinion

69 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard BLUE-SKY, aka Rickie Blue-Sky, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director; Teena Farmon, Warden CCWF; R.E. Stebbins, Correctional Officer; C. Castillo; Jack R. Reagan, Chief Inmate Appeals; Lew Kuykendall and Duane Tessmer, Information Systems Representative, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15556. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 1, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Richard (Rickie) Blue-Sky appeals pro se the district court's denial of her motion for injunctive relief in her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, alleging prison officials violated her constitutional rights when they confiscated her word processor. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's denial of a request for a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.