Robert Bandura v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

69 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert BANDURA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70352. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 17, 1995. Decided Nov. 2, 1995. Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Anb-eoa-fim. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, D.W. NELSON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Robert Bandura petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (Board) dismissal of his appeal from the immigration judge's (IJ) decision holding him deportable under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(2)(B)(i). 2 Bandura argues that the Board erred in considering an unauthenticated, hearsay list of prior convictions that was not before the IJ and that became part of the record after the IJ rendered his decision. Based in part on the listed convictions, the Board concluded that Bandura was a "menace on the road" and…