Tucker

Tucker v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

Good Law
158 F.3d 1046·98 Daily Journal DAR 11087·1998 WL 740920·1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27116·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7981
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 1998No. 97-55419California2,249 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pregerson, J.

In 1991, plaintiff Erin Page Tucker sued her breast implant manufacturer’s corporate successor Baxter Healthcare to recover for autoimmune injuries allegedly caused by breast implants she received in 1974. Although Tucker suffered from a variety of health problems starting in 1977, these problems were not diagnosed as an incurable autoimmune disease until 1988. Furthermore, Tucker purportedly did not discover the relationship between her ruptured silicone gel breast implants and her autoimmune disease until 1990. The district court granted summary judgment to Baxter Healthcare based on the running of the one-year statute of limitations.

Tucker appeals from the grant of summary judgment. We reverse and remand for further proceedings based on the tolling of the statute of limitations and the existence of material facts in dispute. We write to clarify when the statute of limitations can be tolled where one’s physical injuries are not commonly thought to relate to a malfunctioning product. We decline to address other grounds raised by Tucker.

I.

In 1974, Dr. Robert Oneal surgically inserted silicone gel breast implants into Tucker. About two years later, Tucker began to experience…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.