Federal Trade Commission v. Douglas Osborne, and Osborne Precious Metals, Inc. Osborne Stern & Co.

69 F.3d 543 1995-2 Trade Cases P 71,164 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant, and Osborne Precious Metals, Inc.; Osborne Stern & Co., Defendants. No. 94-55615. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 19, 1995. * Decided Oct. 27, 1995. 1 Before: HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and JONES, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Douglas Osborne appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") in the FTC's action against Osborne and two corporations controlled by Osborne. Osborne also appeals the district court's refusal to authorize disbursement of frozen corporate assets for the payment of attorneys' fees and legal expenses arising from Osborne's defense of this action. We affirm the district court order in both regards. I. 4 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit…