Ferris v. Cavallaro

69 F.3d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sam FERRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dave CAVALLARO; Jack Farmer, Officer, San Jose Police Department; Michael E. Smith, Officer, San Jose Police Department; San Jose Police Department; City of San Jose; Santa Clara County; State of California; Frank Berry, Prosecutor, District Attorney's Office; Employment Development Department of California; Loren Ferguson; Nora Dahl; Officer Vasquez; Linda Welding; State Compensation Insurance Fund; George Kennedy; Robert Ahern; Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15182. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 1, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sam Ferris appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Ferris challenges criminal charges filed against him for the operation of a nude-modeling/escort service. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec.…