Harry Irving v. Los Angeles Unified School District

69 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harry IRVING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55698. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 16, 1995. * Decided Oct. 27, 1995. 1 Before: HUG and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and Muecke, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ***/ 3 Harry Irving, a school teacher, appeals a judgment in favor of the Los Angeles Unified School District following a jury trial, in Irving's action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-2 et seq., alleging that he was denied a promotion to the position of assistant principal on the basis of race. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 4 Irving alleges that the district court abused its discretion regarding a variety of trial errors. Having reviewed each of Irving's contentions, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its…