Healy v. Phillips

69 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lee W. HEALY, aka: Mrs. Richard J. Healy, surviving spouse; Brian C. Healy, minor grandson of Richard J. Healy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Evelyn J. PHILLIPS; Norman Rasmussen, Director, decedent's corporation; James Edson; Timothy J. Walsh, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56624. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 1, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lee W. Healy appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her diversity action for failure to prosecute. She also appeals the district court's order granting the defendants' motion for change of venue from the District of Nevada to the Central District of California. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. I. Change of Venue 3 The district court transferred Healy's action to the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1404…