Paul N. Kuderer Lavaughn Kuderer v. Farmers Home Administration David C. Nicholson

69 F.3d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul N. KUDERER; Lavaughn Kuderer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION; David C. Nicholson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35482. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 18, 1995. * Decided Oct. 24, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, D.W. NELSON and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Paul N. and LaVaughn A. Kuderer brought this action, pro se, against the Farmers Home Administration (Administration) and David C. Nicholson, the District Director in the Administration's Clackamas district office. Their complaint alleges numerous constitutional, statutory, and common law violations arising from their dealings with the Administration and the foreclosure of their farm in 1987. The district court entered summary judgment and dismissed the action. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review a district court's summary judgment de novo.…