United States v. Mark G. Sertich, AKA Mark Sertich

69 F.3d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark G. SERTICH, aka Mark Sertich, Defendant-Appellant, No. 94-50597. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1995. Decided Oct. 24, 1995. 1 Before: BROWNING and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges and TANNER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Mark Sertich appeals from the denial of his motion to enforce the nonprosecution paragraph of his plea agreement entered into in the Central District of California to bar a subsequent prosecution in the Northern District of Indiana. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal and AFFIRM. I. FACTS 4 The parties are aware of the facts and procedural background leading up to this appeal so we will not repeat them here. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW 5 This court reviews de novo whether or not a provision of a plea agreement is ambiguous. United States v. Anderson, 970 F.2d 602, 606 (1992), amended, 990 F.2d…