Richard Thaon Tappan v. State of Oregon Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General the District Court in the County of Douglas

69 F.3d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard Thaon TAPPAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON; Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General; the District Court in the County of Douglas, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-36119. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 1, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Thaon Tappan interlocutorily appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Because the district court subsequently dismissed Tappan's action, Tappan's interlocutory appeal is merged with the dismissal of the action. See Securities & Exch. Comm'n v. Mount Vernon Memorial Park, 664 F.2d 1358, 1361 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 (1982). Tappan did not appeal the dismissal of his action, and, therefore, the appeal of the denial of his motion for injunctive relief is moot.…