Thomas
Thomas v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Dept.
Opinion
Opinion
69 F.3d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dudley Earl THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer D. McCarthur, P # 3615; Sgt. R. Jett, P # 1632; G. Sherwood, Officer; M. Wildeman, Officer; D. Reid, Officer; Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-17005. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 16, 1995. * Decided Oct. 24, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Dudley Thomas appeals pro se from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in his civil rights action against several Las Vegas police officers and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We vacate and remand for further proceedings. Before entering summary judgment, "[d]istrict courts are obligated to advise prisoner pro per litigants of [Fed.R.Civ.P.] 56 requirements." Klingele v.…