United States v. Robert George White

69 F.3d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert George WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 16, 1995. Decided Oct. 27, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Robert George White appeals, for the second time, the district court's sentence following his guilty plea to eleven counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). We affirm. 3 White first contends in this appeal that the district court erred in failing to credit his federal sentence for the period of his state sentence served after his initial date in federal custody. White sought a similar result in his first appeal, and this court approved the consecutive sentence. See United States v. White, No. 91-10394 (9th Cir. Mar. 31, 1993). 4 In this appeal, White seeks to take advantage of an intervening sentencing guideline…