United States v. Ramon Cancio-German

69 F.3d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon CANCIO-GERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50610. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 19, 1995. * Decided Oct. 31, 1995. Before: POOLE, BOOCHEVER, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramon Cancio-German appeals his conviction and sentence for importation of marihuana and possession of marihuana with intent to distribute. We AFFIRM. I. Sufficiency of the evidence 3 Cancio-German claims there was insufficient evidence that he knowingly possessed the 193.7 pounds of marihuana hidden in the bed of the truck he drove into the United States. Because Cancio-German failed to move for a judgment of acquittal at the conclusion of the government's case and at the close of all the evidence, we review his argument that the evidence was insufficient for plain error, to prevent a miscarriage of justice. United States v. Winslow, 962…