United States v. Anthony Andrew Yiaadey

Good Law
69 F.3d 545·1995 WL 643250·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 37876
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 199594-50369California977 words

Opinion

Opinion

69 F.3d 545 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Andrew YIAADEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50369. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. * Decided Nov. 1, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Andrew Yiaadey appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to receipt and possession of stolen mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1708 . Yiaadey contends that the district court erred by (1) adjusting his offense level upwards by two levels for obstruction of justice, (2) refusing to grant a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility, and (3) ruling that the amount of loss was $35,997. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. F291, and we affirm. 3 The district court's application of the Sentencing Guidelines is reviewed de novo. United States v. Buenrostro-Torres, 24 F.3d 1173, 1174 (9th Cir.1994) (per…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.