Elliott Warner v. Gowin Sandahl

69 F.3d 546 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elliott WARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOWIN; Sandahl, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15476. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 11, 1995. * Decided Oct. 20, 1995. Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Elliott Warner, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action and denial of his motions for appointment of counsel. The district court dismissed Warner's action pursuant to an Eastern District of California district court local rule for failure to comply with court orders. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. 3 We review a district court's dismissal pursuant to its local rules for abuse of discretion. Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 1995 U.S. LEXIS 5728 (1995). 4 Under the Eastern District of California local rule, "copies of all…