Joel Villareal v. Philippine Airlines, Incorporated

69 F.3d 546 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joel VILLAREAL Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15949. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 19, 1995. Decided Nov. 2, 1995. Before: SNEED, PREGERSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Plaintiff-Appellant Joel Villareal appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellees Philippine Airlines, Inc. ("PAL"). Villareal sued PAL alleging age-based discrimination in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal.Gov't Code Sec. 12941, breach of his employment contract, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 The district court found that Villareal had not presented a prima facie case of age discrimination. The court found, however, that even if Villareal had presented a prima facie…