United States v. $273,969.04 U.S. Currency

Good Law
164 F.3d 462·99 Daily Journal DAR 211·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 37·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 171
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 1999No. 95-55882California2,069 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Claimant Regina Puzo appeals summary judgment in favor of the United States in its civil, suit seeking forfeiture of $273,969.04 in currency pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 5317 , and *464 four pieces of jewelry valued at $117,500.00 pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1497 . Puzo contends the forfeitures violate the Double Jeopardy Clause and the Excessive Fines Clause. We affirm the district court’s holding that neither forfeiture violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. We vacate the district court’s holding that the currency forfeiture under § 5317 does not violate the Excessive Fines Clause and remand. We affirm the district court’s holding that the jewelry forfeiture under § 1497 does not violate the Excessive Fines Clause.

I.

A search of Puzo at the Los Angeles International Airport disclosed she was carrying $266,203.00 in U.S. currency and 5,720 in British pounds and four pieces of jewelry concealed on her person. Puzo was charged with failure to comply with monetary transaction reporting requirements ( 31 U.S.C. § 5322 ) and making a false statement to a customs official ( 18 U.S.C. § 1001 ). She pled guilty to the 18 U.S.C. § 1001 charge and was sentenced.

The government then brought this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.