Northern California District Council Of Laborers v. Pittsburg-Des Moines Steel Co.

Good Law
69 F.3d 1034·95 Daily Journal DAR 15055·150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2839·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 31811·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 199593-16645California2,062 words

Opinion

Opinion

69 F.3d 1034 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2839 , 131 Lab.Cas. P 11,452 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8699 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15 ,055 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS, on its own Behalf and on Behalf of Laborers Local Union No. 185, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PITTSBURG-DES MOINES STEEL CO., Defendant, and Pitt-Des Moines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-16645. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 13, 1995. Decided Nov. 13, 1995. William S. Myers, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Atlanta, Georgia, for defendant-appellant. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Oakland, California, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before NORRIS, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. OPINION WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 This action to confirm an arbitration award was originally filed in San Francisco Superior Court by the Northern California District Council of Laborers. Defendant Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. removed the action to federal court, asserting federal question and diversity jurisdiction. The district court remanded the case to San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.