Heyne v. Caruso

69 F.3d 1475 69 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 408 , 64 USLW 2312 , 43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 64 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8618 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14 ,885 Sheryl G. HEYNE, aka Sheryl G. Hill, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mario CARUSO, individually, and in his capacity as Trustee for The Mario Caruso & Anneliese Caruso Revocable Family Trust, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15124. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1995. Decided Nov. 8, 1995. Richard Segerblom, Las Vegas, Nevada, for plaintiff-appellant. Theresa M. Dowling, Las Vegas, Nevada, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Before: CHOY, CANBY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. CHOY, Circuit Judge: 1 Sheryl G. Heyne ("Heyne") appeals a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Mario Caruso ("Caruso"), in her action alleging quid pro quo sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e-2000e17. Heyne argues that the district court erred by excluding testimony of other female employees who allegedly were sexually harassed by Caruso. Heyne further claims that the district court erred by…