Gallo Cattle Co. v. California Milk Advisory Board

Good Law
167 F.3d 1247·99 Daily Journal DAR 1397·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1939·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1123
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 1999No. 97-17182California4,273 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nelson, J.

Gallo Cattle Company (“Gallo”) filed an action against the California Milk Producers Advisory Board (“CMAB”); Ann M. Vene-man, Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture (“Secretary”); and the State of California (collectively “defendants”), alleging that CMAB’s compulsory assessments for the promotion and advertising of California milk and dairy products violate Gallo’s First Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants, and Gallo timely appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.

I.

A. Statutory and Regulatory Background

In 1937, California implemented the California Marketing Act (“Marketing Act” or “Act”), Cal. Food & Agric. Code § 58601 et seq., to prevent economic waste in the marketing of commodities, to develop more efficient and equitable methods of marketing commodities, and to provide the methods and means for maintaining present markets for, as well as developing new and larger markets for, commodities grown within the State. See Cal. Food & Agric. Code §§ 58652 , 58654. The Secretary is charged with administering the Marketing Act, see Cal. Food & Agric. Code § 58711 , and is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.