Lambert

Lambert v. Ackerly

Good Law
169 F.3d 666·5 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 677·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1750
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 1999Nos. 96-36017, 96-36266, 96-36267California53 words

Lead Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this ease be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Lambert v. Ackerly, 156 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir.1998), is withdrawn.

. Judge McKeown was recused.