Rodrigues

United States v. Rodrigues

Good Law

170 F.3d 881·1999 WL 133275·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4120·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1850

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 1999No. 97-10113California179 words

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The opinion filed on October 28, 1998 is amended as follows:

At slip op. p. 12496, first ¶ , Ins 1-2 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Stephen Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12496, third ¶, Ins 2-3 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”;

Same paragraph, Ins 7 & 9 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12497, first ¶, In 1 [159 F.3d at 449]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Wayne T. Lamprey” with “The prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, first ¶ , Ins 3-4 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Sehirle” with “the prosecutor”;

Same paragraph, In 5 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Assistant United States Attorney Lamprey” with “the prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, second ¶, Ins 4 & 7 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Lamprey” with “The prosecutor”.

Slip op. p. 12499, third ¶, In 1 [159 F.3d at 450]: Replace “Lamprey’s” with “The prosecutor’s”.

With these amendments, the petitions for rehearing are DENIED.