Lowenschuss

Lowenschuss v. Selnick

Good Law
170 F.3d 923·22 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2649·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4244
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 1999Nos. 96-17213, 97-16506California4,817 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Fred Lowenschuss (“Debtor”) appeals the district court’s orders: (1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Beverly Selnick’s (“Selniek”) motion for leave to seek a QDRO in the Pennsylvania courts; (2) vacating the bankruptcy court’s ruling that the Pennsylvania divorce court awarded Selniek a money judgment in Debtor’s beneficial interest in the Fred Lowenschuss & Associates at Law Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”); and (3) vacating the bankruptcy court’s order confirming Debtor’s proposed plan of reorganization. Sun International, Inc. 1 (“Sun”) has intervened in that part of the appeal addressing the district court’s order vacating the bankruptcy court’s money judgment ruling. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm each of the district court’s orders.

BACKGROUND

On September 28, 1981, Selniek filed for divorce in the Pennsylvania courts. Almost ten years later, in July 1991, a Pennsylvania divorce court entered an order (the “Divorce Decree”) for the equitable distribution of the marital property of Debtor and Selniek. The Divorce Decree awarded Selniek, inter alia, 38.7% of Debtor’s interest in the Pension Plan. The divorce court ordered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.