Central Green Co. v. United States

Good Law
177 F.3d 834·99 Daily Journal DAR 4783·1999 WL 314690·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9681·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3722
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 1999No. 97-17321California2,724 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Trott, J.

I.OVERVIEW

Central Green Company (“Central Green”) appeals a district court decision dismissing its claims against the United States for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Central Green sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act for damage to its pistachio farm caused by subsurface and surface water flooding from the Madera Canal. The district court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that Central Green’s claims were barred by 33 U.S.C. § 702c immunity for management of flood control waters. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

II.BACKGROUND

Appellant Central Green owns one thousand'acres of pistachio orchards in Madera County, California. The Madera Canal is a federal water management project that runs through Central Green’s property, conveying irrigation water throughout the San Joaquin Valley. Although flood control is not one of the stated purposes of the Madera Canal, the Madera Canal is part of the Central Valley Project, which has flood control as one of its congressionally authorized purposes. The United States owns the Madera Canal but has entered into an agreement giving the Madera…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.