Mingtai Fire & Marine Insurance v. United Parcel Service

Good Law
177 F.3d 1142·99 Daily Journal DAR 4991·1999 WL 326134·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 10043·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3912
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 1999No. 98-15088California2,005 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Scannlain, J.

We must determine whether adherence to the Warsaw Convention by the People’s Republic of China also binds Taiwan.

I

Mingtai Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (“Mingtai”), insured a package, shipped by Gemtronics Corp. from Taipei, Taiwan to.San Jose, California, which was lost en route by United Parcel Service, the air carrier. Mingtai alleged that the lost package contained computer chips worth $83,454.80 and brought suit against United Parcel Service and United Parcel International, Inc. (collectively “UPS”), in the Northern District of California alleging, inter alia, loss of cargo under the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air, Oct. 12, 1929, 49 Stat. 3000 , T.S. No. 876 (1934), reprinted in note following 49 U.S.C.A. § 40105 (the “Warsaw Convention” or the “Convention”).

UPS answered that the Convention did not apply, and that its air carrier liability was therefore limited to the $100 released value provided by the air waybill. Upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court so held, concluding that Taiwan, which is not a signatory to the Convention, was not bound by the People’s Republic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.