Henry

Henry v. Kernan

Good Law
177 F.3d 1152·99 Daily Journal DAR 5023·1999 WL 330262·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 10568·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3937
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 26, 1999No. 98-15768California3,408 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tashima, J.

We must decide whether a confession concededly obtained in violation of Miranda 1 was involuntarily made so as to prohibit its use for impeachment purposes at trial. Contrary to the recommendation of the magistrate judge, to whom the case had been referred, the district court denied habeas relief to Bobby Henry (“Henry”), finding that his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and his constitutional right to privacy were not violated. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we reverse and remand.

I.

Henry was arrested for killing Bill With-row after he turned himself in to the Sacramento County Sheriffs Department. Following his arrest, Henry was questioned for several hours by Detectives White and Machen. The two detectives continued to interrogate Henry after he requested counsel. In response to the detectives’ further questioning, Henry made a detailed confession.

An information was filed in the Sacramento County Superior Court charging Henry with murder. The first trial ended in a mistrial after the jury deadlocked. At the second trial, a hearing was held to determine whether Henry’s post-Miranda statements to the detectives were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.