Federal Trade Commission v. Affordable Media, LLC

Good Law
179 F.3d 1228·99 Daily Journal DAR 5991·1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13130·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 1999No. 98-16378California7,849 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiggins, J.

A husband and wife, Denyse and Michael Anderson, were involved in a telemarketing venture that offered investors the chance to participate in a project that sold such modern marvels as talking pet tags and water-filled barbells by means of late-night television. Although the promoters promised that an investment in the project would return 50 per cent in a mere 60 to 90 days, the venture in fact was a Ponzi scheme, which eventually unraveled and left thousands of investors with tremendous losses. When the Federal Trade Commission brought a complaint against the telemarketing duo, they claimed that they were simply innocent dupes rather than a modern day telephonic Bonnie and Clyde.

While the investors’ money was lost in the fraudulent scheme, the Andersons’ profits from their commissions remained safely tucked away across the sea in a Cook Islands trust. When the Commission brought a civil action to recover as much money as possible for the defrauded investors, the Andersons advanced two incredible propositions. First, they claimed that they should retain the 45 percent commissions they received for their role in the fraud, even though they acknowledged that the investors were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.